Given $n$ nonnegative integer weights $w_1, \ldots, w_n$ and an integer knapsack capacity $T$, the $\#$Knapsack problem asks to count the number of subsets $I \subseteq \{1, 2, \dots, n\}$ such that $\sum_{i \in I} w_i \le T$. A long line of research has been devoted to designing faster $(1 \pm \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithms for this \#P-hard problem. Until very recently, the best-known time complexity was $\tilde{O}\bigl(n^{2.5}/\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\bigr)$, achieved by the randomized algorithm of [Dyer, STOC 2003] and the deterministic algorithm of [Gawrychowski, Markin, and Weimann, ICALP 2018]. The recent work by [Feng and Jin, SODA 2025] improved the randomized complexity to $\tilde{O}\bigl(n^{1.5}/\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\bigr)$, leaving open the question whether this $n^{2.5}$ barrier could also be broken by a \emph{deterministic} algorithm. In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative by presenting a deterministic $(1 + \varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for \#Knapsack in $\tilde{O}\bigl(n^{2.4}/\mathrm{poly}(\varepsilon)\bigr)$ time. Our key technical innovation is to deterministically simulate the balancing technique, which was previously used in the literature of knapsack-type problems via random partitions and seemed to require randomization.

翻译：暂无翻译