A simple read interface provides uniform functional semantics, but not equally simple or predictable performance behavior. We use synchronous large-buffer reads in Linux as an observation window and decompose the buffered-read path end to end, distinguishing work volume, processing time, and critical-path exposure. We find that Linux reduces metadata work through large folios and overlaps most cold-read copying with device waiting, but these mechanisms depend on access advice, folio granularity, cache state, and backend execution. Using an experimental kernel prototype, we validate additional opportunities from out-of-order early copying and opportunistic parallelism, while showing that faster request submission does not improve end-to-end performance when SSD supply is already sufficient. To explain device waiting, we abstract first-completion wait $F$ and subsequent completion capacity $B_{CQ}$ from finite request-batch completion timelines. Measurements on a real SSD characterize how they vary with request size and batch size, while MQSim experiments connect them to internal device mechanisms and distinguish finite-batch completion from sustained throughput. We then construct a cross-layer wait chain along the actual folio--bio--request mapping. Independently calibrated device parameters predict waiting at the block layer and at read_pages with errors no greater than approximately 6.9% and 3.2%, respectively. Finally, four use cases apply the model and wait chain to parallel submission, Linux readahead, dependent-read layout, and polling versus sleeping. Their gains, no gains, and gain reversals form a closed loop from observation and modeling to explanation and control, providing a measurable basis for performance decisions in layered I/O stacks.

翻译：暂无翻译