Horizontal (automatic) and vertical (control) processes have been observed and reported for a long time in translation production. Schaeffer and Carl's Monitor Model integrates these two processes into one framework, assuming that priming mechanisms underlie horizontal/automatic processes, while vertical/monitoring processes implement consciously accessible control mechanisms. The Monitor Model has been criticized in various ways and several misconceptions have accumulated over the past years. In this chapter, I update the Monitor Model with additional evidence and argue that it is compatible with an enactivist approach to cognition. I address several misconceptions related to the Monitor Model.

翻译：在翻译产出中，水平（自动）和垂直（控制）过程已被观察和报告了很长时间。Schaeffer和Carl的监测模型将这两个过程整合到一个框架中，假设启动机制是水平/自动过程的基础，而垂直/监测过程则实现有意识可及的控制机制。监测模型受到各种批评，并且多年来积累了许多误解。在本章中，我通过额外证据更新了监测模型，并论证其与生成认知方法兼容。我针对与监测模型相关的若干误解进行了说明。