The emergent abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), which power tools like ChatGPT and Bard, have produced both excitement and worry about how AI will impact academic writing. In response to rising concerns about AI use, authors of academic publications may decide to voluntarily disclose any AI tools they use to revise their manuscripts, and journals and conferences could begin mandating disclosure and/or turn to using detection services, as many teachers have done with student writing in class settings. Given these looming possibilities, we investigate whether academics view it as necessary to report AI use in manuscript preparation and how detectors react to the use of AI in academic writing.

翻译：大型语言模型（LLMs）的涌现能力——这些模型为ChatGPT和Bard等工具提供支持——既引发了人们对AI将如何影响学术写作的兴奋，也带来了担忧。为应对日益增长的AI使用担忧，学术出版物作者可能自愿披露他们在修改稿件中使用的任何AI工具，而期刊和会议可能开始强制要求披露，或转而使用检测服务——正如许多教师在课堂场景中对待学生写作那样。鉴于这些迫近的可能性，我们调查了学术界是否认为有必要在稿件制备中报告AI使用情况，以及检测器如何应对学术写作中AI的使用。