Hollow-core fibers (HCF) are transitioning from laboratory curiosities to production-deployed infrastructure, with cloud providers operating thousands of kilometers of hollow-core links. As operators upgrade their networks, working and protection paths will inevitably traverse different fiber types, creating a class of protection switching challenges absent in homogeneous single-mode fiber networks. This article provides a comprehensive overview of these challenges and presents a comparative analysis of protection switching under two architectures - 1+1 dedicated and shared backup path protection (SBPP) - in hybrid hollow-core and single-mode fiber networks. Using Monte Carlo simulation with random per-link fiber assignment across six reference topologies (1,602 node pairs), we quantify chromatic dispersion (CD) steps, generalized signal-to-noise ratio (GSNR) penalties, and modulation-format degradation for both architectures. At 50% HCF deployment mean CD steps range from 4,000 to 22,000 ps/nm, with GSNR penalties of 1.6-3.1 dB and 38-59% of node pairs requiring modulation downgrade under 1+1 protection. A complementary cross-fiber extreme analysis reveals that the two switching directions are fundamentally asymmetric: HCF-to-SMF switching doubles the CD step and inflicts about a 10 dB GSNR penalty while SMF-to-HCF switching delivers a negative GSNR penalty (the protection path is higher quality than the working path). SBPP shows up to 7% higher CD steps and 4 percentage points more downgrade in sparsely connected topologies due to its greedy shortest-first path selection. Capacity retention improves with HCF penetration for both architectures, reaching 85-99% at full HCF deployment. We present mitigation strategies including DSP pre-loading, spectral pre-equalization, and network planning guidelines, concluding that 1+1 dedicated protection is preferable to SBPP for hybrid deployments.

翻译：暂无翻译