We compare the performance of a transition-based parser in regards to different annotation schemes. We pro-pose to convert some specific syntactic constructions observed in the universal dependency treebanks into a so-called more standard representation and to evaluate parsing performances over all the languages of the project. We show that the ``standard'' constructions do not lead systematically to better parsing performance and that the scores vary considerably according to the languages.

翻译：我们比较了基于转移的句法分析器在不同标注方案下的性能。我们提出将通用依存树库中观察到的一些特定句法结构转换为一种所谓的更标准表示，并在该项目的所有语言上评估句法分析性能。研究表明，"标准"结构并不系统性地带来更好的句法分析性能，且得分因语言不同而存在显著差异。