Like many other voting systems, Majority Judgement suffers from the weaknesses of the underlying mathematical model: Elections as problem of choice or ranking. We show how the model can be enhanced to take into account the complete process starting from the whole set of persons having passive electoral rights and even the aspect of reelection. By a new view on abstentions from voting and an adaption of Majority Judgement with three grades, we are able to describe a complete process for an election that can be easily put into legislation and sets suitable incentives for politicians who want to be reelected.

翻译：与众多其他投票系统类似，多数决存在其基础数学模型的固有缺陷：选举被视为抉择或排序问题。我们展示了如何改进该模型，以纳入涵盖拥有被动选举权的全体人员乃至连任因素的完整过程。通过重新审视弃权现象，并结合采用三种等级的多数决方法，我们能够描述一个完整的选举流程。该流程易于被纳入立法，并为寻求连任的政治家设置恰当的激励机制。