Exhaustive optimistic scoring can make action selection costly in linear bandits with a large fixed set of $K$ actions, requiring $\mathcal{O}(K)$ score evaluations per round. We introduce Persistent Candidate LinUCB (\textsc{PC-LinUCB}), which maintains $k$ active actions and samples $q$ challengers uniformly from the remaining $K-k$ actions at each round. By scoring only these $k+q$ candidates, \textsc{PC-LinUCB} reduces the number of score evaluations per round to $\mathcal{O}(k+q)$. We establish problem-independent and problem-dependent high-probability regret bounds consisting of a standard linear-bandit learning term and an additive discovery cost of order $\mathcal{O}\left((K-k)\log(K-k)/q\right)$ at fixed confidence. Notably, this additional cost does not grow with the horizon. For fixed gaps and sufficiently long horizons, we establish an $Ω\left((K-k)/q\right)$ regret lower bound under uniform challenger sampling, showing that partial candidate access itself imposes an unavoidable regret cost. Experiments show that \textsc{PC-LinUCB} substantially accelerates LinUCB while maintaining comparable regret, and that the persistent candidate mechanism can extend beyond LinUCB.

翻译：暂无翻译