We test whether a parameterized quantum circuit (PQC) improves a hybrid quantum-classical model's performance on classical datasets, using an interface-matched classical map as the control while holding all other components fixed. Our architecture, Quantum-Embedded Attention (QEA), uses a learnable projector to compress backbone features into an $n_q$-dimensional angle vector, a shallow PQC to map those angles to one- and two-qubit Pauli expectations, and a classical attention decoder to produce class logits. We hypothesized the PQC would improve accuracy or seed-to-seed stability over a classical map with matched input/output dimensions. We test this with an interface-matched $2\times2$ factorial on Breast Cancer Wisconsin at $n_q\in\{4,8\}$, independently swapping the PQC for a classical map and the attention decoder for a linear head, across five paired seeds per cell. Three of four paired quantum-minus-classical $95\%$ confidence intervals include zero; the fourth, a $+1.63$ percentage-point contrast for the attention decoder at $n_q=4$, reverses sign at $n_q=8$ and does not survive correction across the four contrasts. The experiment thus shows no consistent PQC contribution and cannot establish equivalence. A five-dataset cross-modality grid shows comparable accuracy on AG~News, Breast Cancer Wisconsin, and BirdCLEF but a large deficit on CIFAR-10; these cells are not interface-matched and are interpreted descriptively. We report all planned canonical runs, distinguish current Pauli-readout results from legacy probability-readout experiments, and analyze bottleneck, simulation, finite-shot, and noise limitations. The results do not establish a quantum advantage; they demonstrate why controlled component attribution is necessary before crediting a hybrid model's performance to its quantum layer.

翻译：暂无翻译