Forward-Forward (FF) training lets each layer learn from a local goodness criterion. In cumulative-goodness variants, later layers can inherit a task that earlier layers have partly separated. We formalize this as layer free-riding: under the softplus FF criterion, the class-discrimination gradient reaching block $d$ decays exponentially with the positive margin accumulated by earlier blocks (Theorem 3.1); a squared-hinge barrier reproduces the pathology. History-free and hardness-gated repairs raise deeper-layer separation by up to $5\times$ on CIFAR-100 and $45\times$ in an 8-block CIFAR-10 model, yet these and a depth-scaled auxiliary term move accuracy by under one percentage point among non-degenerate variants; on Tiny ImageNet, a harder cross-dataset check of the selected configuration, layer health likewise does not track accuracy. A theory-derived attenuation-compensated objective raises deepest-block separation $5.9\times$ at a consistent cost in the FF classifier's own accuracy that a probe trained on the frozen features recovers; in a smaller CIFAR-10 control, most of its separation gain comes from dropping the depth-scaled auxiliary term it replaces. Accuracy invariance is a property of the deployed sum-based scoring rule under redistribution (Proposition 3.2) and, empirically, of the structured trained readouts we test, not of what the network learns: retrained variants disagree on 13-26% of test predictions. Architecture and augmentation matter far more than the non-degenerate training rules studied. Cumulative free-riding is therefore a real and repairable pathology, but for the softplus and squared-hinge objectives, architectures, and datasets we study, it is not the dominant factor limiting accuracy.

翻译：暂无翻译