Measuring idea similarity is fundamental to creativity evaluation, especially as LLMs enable idea generation at increasing scale. However, text embeddings collapse an idea into a single vector, making it difficult to capture structural similarity, including partial overlap across core and supporting components and differences across levels of abstraction. We introduce a shared structural representation that decomposes ideas into purpose, mechanism, and implementation components and organizes related components in a multi-layer concept graph. From this representation, we define measures of pairwise similarity and set-level mechanism coverage for assessing idea diversity. We evaluate our approach using controlled idea triples and assessments from 12 experts, focusing on differences in core mechanisms, implementations, and supporting components. Our method improves alignment with expert judgments of structural similarity by 31% over the embedding baseline and better reflects expert assessments of idea set coverage, supporting scalable evaluation of idea similarity and diversity.

翻译：暂无翻译