Many modern systems involve the strategic interaction of multiple agents. In such settings, observed actions typically reflect equilibrium behavior under utilities that are only partially known. Recovering these hidden utilities from data - the central goal of inverse game theory - is key for prediction, counterfactual analysis, and mechanism design. However, existing approaches based on inverse variational inequalities are highly sensitive to noisy and inconsistent equilibrium observations, thus limiting their applicability. In this paper, we resolve this issue by introducing a game-theoretic suboptimality loss that measures the aggregate utility gain players could obtain by unilaterally deviating from an observed strategy profile. First, we show that this loss is convex and admits an efficient decomposition into player-wise best-responses. Second, we show this loss is sandwiched between the predictability loss and the inverse variational inequality loss, making it a tractable surrogate for equilibrium prediction. Third, we develop a mirror descent algorithm to minimize it and demonstrate on a heterogeneous networked Cournot competition that our approach remains accurate under noisy observations and inconsistent equilibrium data while inverse variational inequality methods produce degenerate estimates.

翻译：暂无翻译