Modern large-scale systems rely on distributed protocols to maximize efficiency while preserving the correctness guarantees of single-process execution. However, designing such protocols is non-trivial: adding resources to a system inherently increases its complexity, which in turn introduces faults that must be addressed during design. One such fault class, arising in systems that use distributed shared memory (e.g., replicated databases), is consistency violating fault (cvf), a fault in which a process accessing shared memory reads stale data previously written by another process. Cvfs are inherent to systems that prioritize availability over strict consistency. Prior work has shown that self-stabilizing programs remain correct under high availability, provided such faults stay within a tolerable bound. Characterizing the behavior of self-stabilizing programs in the presence of cvfs can therefore help system designers build systems that are both correct and efficient. In this paper, we study self-stabilizing programs under cvfs to understand when and where such faults occur, enabling runtime measures that improve computational efficiency. Since exhaustive state-space exploration does not scale, it suffers from state-space explosion; our study investigates two complementary approaches: a conflict-based state-space exploration technique for monotonically stabilizing $(Δ + 1)$-Graph Coloring programs, and a machine-learning-based approach for a Maximal Independent Set program. We propose a conflicting-edges-based state-space exploration algorithm alongside a rigorously validated ML model, evaluated on an out-of-distribution dataset through structural consistency checks against known graph invariants.

翻译：暂无翻译