Model-internal signals, such as neuron activations and gradients, have been used for instruction data selection, yet how neuron relevance should be characterized remains underexplored. In particular, should selection prioritize the magnitude of relevance or how broadly it is distributed across neurons? To investigate this question, we construct sample-level relevance profiles using AttnLRP-guided attribution and introduce two complementary criteria: Effective Relevance Support (ERS), which measures the effective support of positive relevance, and Positive Relevance Magnitude (PRM), which captures its average strength. Our analyses reveal that these characterizations produce distinct sample rankings and selection preferences despite sharing the same underlying relevance profiles. On Qwen2 models, PRM exhibits stronger associations with activation-based selection, whereas ERS produces substantially different rankings. These differences extend to task composition, within-task sample preferences, and semantic selection patterns, with varying degrees of agreement across backbones. Experiments across three language models and five downstream benchmarks demonstrate the practical value of relevance-guided selection, with ERS achieving the best overall average performance rank among the evaluated methods. Our findings highlight that how neuron relevance is distributed and characterized, rather than its magnitude alone, matters for instruction data selection.

翻译：暂无翻译