Speech-pretrained models have shown promise in animal bioacoustics, but the factors governing their cross-species transfer remain poorly understood. We evaluate 15 frozen encoders spanning monolingual and multilingual speech, speaker verification, animal bioacoustics, and general audio on caller identification across four species and call-type classification across three. Differences between the strongest speech- and animal-pretrained representations range from $-0.027$ to $+0.119$ UAR; speech is significantly better in three of seven settings ($p<0.01$) and not significantly different in the remaining four. Controlled comparisons show no systematic advantage from increased language coverage or animal-domain pretraining, while frozen speaker-verification embeddings transfer poorly. The results also show that transfer is strongly layer-dependent: raw-waveform models peak early, whereas patch-spectrogram models peak deeper.

翻译：暂无翻译