We address the issue of defining a semantics for deontic argumentation that supports weak permission. Some recent results show that grounded semantics do not support weak permission when there is a conflict between two obligations. We provide a definition of Deontic Argumentation Theory that accounts for weak permission, and we recall the result about grounded semantics. Then, we propose a new semantics that supports weak permission.

翻译：本文探讨如何定义支持弱允许的道义论证语义。近期结果表明，当两项义务存在冲突时，基础语义无法支持弱允许。我们提出一种可解释弱允许的道义论证理论定义，并重述了关于基础语义的结论。随后，我们提出一种支持弱允许的新语义。