Since Automated Driving Systems are not expected to operate flawlessly, Automated Vehicles will require human assistance in certain situations. For this reason, teleoperation offers the opportunity for a human to be remotely connected to the vehicle and assist it. The Remote Operator can provide extensive support by directly controlling the vehicle, eliminating the need for Automated Driving functions. However, due to the physical disconnection to the vehicle, monitoring and controlling is challenging compared to driving in the vehicle. Therefore, this work follows the approach of simplifying the task for the Remote Operator by separating the path and velocity input. In a study using a miniature vehicle, different operator-vehicle interactions and input devices were compared based on collisions, task completion time, usability and workload. The evaluation revealed significant differences between the three implemented prototypes using a steering wheel, mouse and keyboard or a touchscreen. The separate input of path and velocity via mouse and keyboard or touchscreen is preferred but is slower compared to parallel input via steering wheel.

翻译：由于自动驾驶系统无法保证完美运行，自动驾驶汽车在某些情况下仍需人类辅助。为此，远程操控技术使人类能够远程连接车辆并提供协助。远程操作员可通过直接控制车辆提供全方位支持，从而无需依赖自动驾驶功能。然而，由于与车辆的物理隔离，相较于车内驾驶，车辆监控与操控更具挑战性。因此，本研究采用分离路径与速度输入的方法来简化远程操作员的任务。在基于微型车辆的研究中，通过碰撞次数、任务完成时间、可用性和工作负荷等指标，对比分析了不同操作员-车辆交互方式及输入设备。评估结果显示，使用方向盘、鼠标键盘及触摸屏的三种原型系统存在显著差异。通过鼠标键盘或触摸屏分别输入路径与速度的方式更受青睐，但其响应速度慢于通过方向盘进行的并行输入。