Generative recommendation based on Semantic IDs (SIDs) represents each item as a discrete sequence of SIDs and is conventionally evaluated by matching the generated SID sequence against the target item's SID sequence. This evaluation is faithful only when each SID sequence uniquely identifies one item. In practice, SID collisions violate this condition: across the evaluated SID tokenizers and datasets, collision rates reach 30.52%, and SID-level Hit@10 is inflated by up to 103.36% relative to item-level Hit@10. To address this evaluation gap, we introduce Collision-Corrected Evaluation (CCE), which defines collision-aware item-level metrics (ItemHit@K, ItemNDCG@K) computed from generated SID sequences, and Zero-Collision Reassignment (ZCR), which constructs zero-collision SID assignments for existing tokenizers via minimum-cost reassignment. Applying these methods to four datasets and five representative SID tokenizers, we find that metric inflation scales with collision rate and is large enough to flip pairwise tokenizer comparisons under item-level re-evaluation. This finding calls into question the reliability of SID-level rankings reported in prior work and indicates that faithful tokenizer evaluation requires item-level correction or zero-collision SID assignments.

翻译：暂无翻译