Residential traffic classification supports service management, but learning across homes must account for heterogeneous traffic and privacy constraints. Privacy-aware training may impose uneven costs across traffic categories. We study this tradeoff in simulated two-client federated learning using 1.62 million preprocessed gateway-collected flows across six categories. We compare a full-feature baseline, feature suppression (FS), and differentially private stochastic gradient descent (DP-SGD) under one fixed record-level privacy setting. FS-mild excludes four timing features from 16 model inputs; it provides no formal privacy guarantee. With size-proportional aggregation, FS-mild achieves higher combined macro-F1 and worst-group F1 (the minimum per-class F1 across homes) than DP-SGD in all five seeds at both model capacities under stratified and temporal splits. The tested DP-SGD configuration incurs pronounced minority-category losses, especially in the smaller home, but FS-mild does not uniformly improve on the full-feature baseline. On stratified-split models, loss-based and shadow-model membership probes show near-chance aggregate discrimination without a consistent ranking across probes; this does not establish equivalent privacy. These findings support FS as an input-minimization baseline, not a substitute for formal privacy.

翻译：暂无翻译