National Basketball Association (NBA) teams have increasingly detailed metrics, but better predictions do not necessarily improve decisions. This critical integrative review draws on prior reviews, citation tracing, and topic searches across seven research streams: on-court action, player value, role, lineup synergy, availability, draft and development, and contracts and roster construction. An observation-state-action-decision-evaluation chain organizes the synthesis. Six decision-readiness gates guide our assessment: point-in-time validity, uncertainty, context portability, action feasibility, opportunity-set observability, and evaluation, with requirements matched to each claim. The reviewed literature is strongest in measuring and predicting individual components of a decision. Evidence is less developed at interfaces that combine components, transfer them across settings, and compare feasible actions. We outline a proposed deployment workflow, a reporting contract, and a research agenda covering player transport, role substitution, roster fragility, legal action generation, and asset valuation. The 2023 collective bargaining agreement and forthcoming 3-2-1 Draft Lottery illustrate how institutional changes generate research questions. Models should inform evaluable comparisons of feasible choices. While its effect on organizational decision quality remains an empirical question, the framework provides a diagnostic and reporting structure for matching decision claims to evidence requirements.

翻译：暂无翻译