Many studies expose units to several binary treatments at once and record several correlated outcomes, yet analysts usually estimate one treatment's average effect on one outcome at a time -- discarding how treatments interact and how their effects vary across units. We introduce the factorial multivariate Bayesian causal forest, a Bayesian nonparametric model that decomposes the factorial response surface over the treatment lattice into a prognostic sum-of-trees plus one sum-of-trees per main or interaction effect, each with correlated multivariate leaf parameters, estimated jointly with coherent uncertainty. A single indicator-weighted kernel samples every component -- the prognostic term is the special case whose indicator is unity -- so the two-treatment model, the single-treatment multivariate causal forest, and a general order-r truncation are one and the same sampler. We give the ANOVA/Möbius identification of each estimand, an efficient Rcpp engine, and an interpretability layer using value-suppressing uncertainty maps. In simulations the average-effect estimators are unbiased with nominal coverage, consistent, and robust under misspecification, failing only under unmeasured confounding, which we flag. We illustrate the method on clinical, agricultural and economic data and on a deeper application to the NHANES survey. Software is provided as an R package.

翻译：暂无翻译