Autonomous agents that author building information models need more than access to a host API. They need a representation of what they intended, what a compiler decided on their behalf, what was refused, what was observed after execution and what remains unknown. We present KIR, a typed intermediate representation in which a building is authored as a program held in a versioned repository and lowered to host applications as build targets. KIR is organised around seven ways in which a generator writing into a stateful, partially observable host goes silently wrong, and gives each a representation in data: ambiguous selectors become typed refusals with candidates; defaults keep their provenance; obligations that will not be checked are named before execution; vacuous witnesses are rejected statically; a lost transaction response becomes the state UNCONFIRMED with a verify-before-retry rule; the reverse path obeys a census invariant; and decisions are bound by digest to the state they were made against. On a pinned snapshot with 83 operation contracts and Revit as the only backend, offline experiments refuse 29 of 42 stress-test programs with diagnostic codes and no uncaught exception, name 38 of 377 witness obligations as unwitnessable, admit 31 of 100 combinations of execution, witness and acceptance states under seven stated invariants, and find no vacuous witness in 219 certificate runs; a 60-storey tower is 11,263 characters as KIR against 3,709,235 characters of emitted C#. Native Revit runs are reported from project records and kept separate from reproduced results. A controlled comparison with agents that write host code directly is specified but not yet executed; it is the principal open question.

翻译：暂无翻译