Quantum channel discrimination is a primitive task for identifying, verifying, and benchmarking quantum dynamics. Previous studies have primarily considered either the best-case tester-input setting or the worst-case jammer-input setting. Here, we introduce a game-theoretic framework in which both the tester and jammer control separate inputs. Combining three input structures, characterized by whether the tester and jammer use entangled inputs or IID inputs across channel uses, with four information patterns, determined by the visibility of the jammer's strategy and its knowledge of the true hypothesis, yields twelve game models. We provide exact finite blocklength hypothesis testing characterizations of all twelve models in terms of nine minimax hypothesis testing divergences and derive their asymptotic Stein exponents. Notably, for entangled jammers, neither the visibility of the jammer's strategy nor its knowledge of the true hypothesis affects the asymptotic Stein exponent, whereas the information pattern remains consequential for IID jammers. As an example, we study the discrimination of a general channel from a replacer channel and show that all asymptotic Stein exponents coincide with the same additive, single letter quantity. We further develop a general argument that upgrades achievability results to strong converse results, thereby establishing strong converse properties for several game models, resolving an open problem in composite hypothesis testing posed by Berta et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. 385, 55 (2021)], and strengthening several recent results of Lami [arXiv:2510.06340]. The framework and techniques developed here may support future studies of quantum information tasks involving competing roles.

翻译：暂无翻译