Exploration in centralized serial-dictatorship matching bandits must use complete matchings, so learning one player--arm pair can impose regret on others. We study this externality under a known common priority order and Gaussian rewards with unit variance. We show that the matching-level Graves--Lai constraints reduce to finitely many pairwise exploration quotas and, at top-choice-separated instances, yield a polynomial-size marginal linear program. At these instances, the exact attainable set of expected logarithmic regret coefficients is $G(θ)\Xset(θ)$, where $\Xset$ is the feasible matching-allocation set and $G$ maps allocations to player regret. The usual upper-closed Graves--Lai region can be strictly larger despite having the same Pareto-minimal boundary. We further show that identical exploration quotas can induce very different regret through their scheduling. Finally, we construct estimate--solve--track policies, uniformly good on the full row-strict class, that attain every fixed positively weighted optimum without assuming optimizer uniqueness. Every Pareto-minimal point is pointwise attainable, possibly through an instance-calibrated target.

翻译：暂无翻译