Modern prediction-driven decision systems often rely on black-box predictors, but a point forecast alone does not provide the uncertainty scale required for robust downstream decision-making. We build a score-calibrated robustness framework that converts any fixed point predictor into a decision-relevant uncertainty representation through distribution-free conformal calibration. We use the conformal score, rather than a particular uncertainty set, as the primitive unit of robustness. The same score determines coverage-calibrated uncertainty sets for reliability-based robust optimization and normalizes target violations in a target-oriented formulation, Conformal Robust Satisficing. This formulation induces a conformal fragility measure that quantifies how rapidly performance deteriorates as the realized parameter departs from the forecast on the conformal score scale. For objective-uncertainty problems under standard convexity and duality conditions, we show that the reliability-based and target-oriented formulations parameterize the same score-calibrated robust decision frontier. This equivalence yields a data-driven mapping between reliability levels and acceptable targets and characterizes the marginal cost of robustness. Synthetic experiments validate the theoretical guarantees and illustrate the reliability-target correspondence. A real-data online-grocery case study demonstrates how the interface combines deep-learning demand forecasts with tractable inventory optimization, thereby improving reliability and reducing operational costs. Overall, our work shows that conformal scores endow fixed black-box predictors with an interpretable uncertainty scale for downstream decision-making while enabling reliability guarantees, acceptable-target selection, and fragility analysis within a unified framework.

翻译：暂无翻译