AI is getting more involved in tasks formerly exclusively assigned to humans. Most of research on perceptions and social acceptability of AI in these areas is mainly restricted to the Western world. In this study, we compare trust, perceived responsibility, and reliance of AI and human experts across OECD and Indian sample. We find that OECD participants consider humans to be less capable but more morally trustworthy and more responsible than AI. In contrast, Indian participants trust humans more than AI but assign equal responsibility for both types of experts. We discuss implications of the observed differences for algorithmic ethics and human-computer interaction.

翻译：人工智能正日益涉足以往完全由人类承担的任务。然而，关于这些领域中人们对人工智能的感知及社会接受度的研究，主要局限于西方世界。在本研究中，我们比较了OECD（经济合作与发展组织）成员国与印度样本对人工智能和人类专家的信任、感知责任及依赖度。研究发现，OECD参与者认为人类虽然能力较弱，但在道德上比人工智能更值得信赖且更具责任感。相反，印度参与者对人类专家的信任度高于人工智能，但认为两种专家应承担同等责任。我们讨论了观察到的差异对算法伦理及人机交互的影响。