Scaling test-time compute has proven highly effective at improving LLM reasoning. A popular method is best-of-n sampling, where a model generates many candidate solutions and one is selected. This motivates the question: how can we select the best candidate? When humans make choices, we find it more natural to compare two options than judge each in isolation. Additionally, when the options become complex, we like to judge the options one aspect at a time, such as comparing two job candidates on experience, communication, etc. In the test-time setting, candidate solutions should be judged in the same way. Here we introduce Aspect-wise Pairwise Tournaments (APT), which verifies by comparison and compares by aspect. Each matchup of a single elimination tournament is decided by a vote over multiple off-the-shelf aspect verifiers, each expressing a pairwise preference along its own aspect. Across five domains and three generator LLMs, APT improves over binary multi-aspect approval, self-consistency and reward model verification, with the largest gains on open-ended tasks. We find that both components matter; neither binary approval over the same aspects nor a generic pairwise judge at a matched budget matches APT. Because aspects are specified in natural language, APT also lets users steer selection toward properties they care about, better aligning with user preferences without needing to regenerate solutions. No component is trained, so APT transfers to new domains by simply rewriting prompts.

翻译：暂无翻译