Causal mediation analyses are increasingly used in psychological sciences. Among the required assumptions, positivity is unfortunately seldom mentioned, likely due to the lack of tools for checking it. Mediational positivity is more complex than positivity in standard, non-mediated exposure effect analysis, because it requires positivity for both the exposure and the mediator, and because the specific form of the positivity assumption depends on the mediation estimand of interest. We propose an extension of the Positivity Regression Trees (PoRT) algorithm -- which was recently designed to check positivity in non-mediated settings without requiring assumptions about the modeling or the data-generating process -- to controlled, natural and interventional mediational effects. We illustrate its use through an application in mental health and have made it accessible through the port R package and a related notebook available at github.com/ArthurChatton/dePoRT-notebook. Finally, we discuss consequences and provide recommendations for when positivity violations are identified.

翻译：暂无翻译