Existing interpretability tools do not test whether a representation keeps the same content when only the phrasing changes. We treat each paraphrase pair as a local witness that two activations should agree and build a cellular sheaf over the paraphrase graph; its Laplacian $L_\mathcal{F}$ answers the question on a frozen model with no training. The kernel $H^0$ is a content subspace: at 20 dimensions it beats the preserved subspace of the concept eraser LEACE on held-out CounterFact fact retrieval across eight architectures by a mean $+17.1$\,pp, and constraining all paraphrases of a fact jointly adds a further $+6.5$\,pp. The spectral complement concentrates causal influence: ablating the most paraphrase-variable coordinates, a coordinate-wise proxy for it, changes model outputs $5.6$ to $26.5\times$ more than ablating coordinates of matched per-coordinate variability, across nine models from 124M to 13B parameters. Stacking layers into a grid creates $b_1 = N(L-1)$ algebraic 1-cycles, and the resulting model-derived harmonic mass varies by nearly three orders of magnitude across six architectures and ranks them as their steering fragility does (Spearman $ρ= 0.90$, exact one-sided permutation $p = 0.014$). The same paraphrase graph yields the content subspace, the influence directions, and the fragility measure. Project page: https://cwru-aism.github.io/gluing-lc-page/

翻译：暂无翻译