The binary perceptron is a random constraint satisfaction problem that asks for a sign vector satisfying a system of random linear inequalities. Its solution space has a strikingly extreme geometry: at every positive constraint density, all but a vanishing fraction of the solutions are isolated. Yet polynomial-time algorithms find solutions at small enough constraint density, which raises the question of how efficient algorithms navigate such a landscape. Linear programming is a natural algorithm to study here, but its analysis has so far been limited to a single round. Li, Schramm, and Zhou (STOC 2025) analyzed one linear program followed by iterative rounding. In this work, we overcome this limitation and give a precise analysis of iterated linear programming for the binary perceptron. (1) For Gaussian matrices and any fixed number of rounds, we characterize the iterated linear programs exactly through a deterministic state-evolution recursion. (2) Adding a final rounding step, we obtain a randomized polynomial-time algorithm for the binary perceptron. Numerical evaluations of the recursion provide evidence that it succeeds at constraint density $α=0.60$ with zero margin, well beyond the range $α\le0.1$ guaranteed by the single-LP analysis and $α\approx0.327$ (Jo and Lee, 2026), the best guarantee so far. (3) We establish universality, showing that the same characterization holds for matrices with i.i.d. entries drawn from any centered, unit-variance subgaussian law. The key idea of our proof is that, although conditioning on earlier rounds makes the matrix non-Gaussian, its conditional law can be computed explicitly and remains close to a Gaussian law, so the convex Gaussian min-max theorem applies in every round. For universality, we compare Gaussian and subgaussian matrices through the Lindeberg principle, using a regularized version of each linear program.

翻译：暂无翻译