Open Radio Access Network (O-RAN) enables network control through multi-vendor xApps operating both within and across layers, subnets, and domains, whose concurrent execution can trigger conflicts that are latent during the development phase. Existing conflict management approaches rely heavily on joint-execution data, which is often unavailable in practice. To address this limitation, we formalize a novel problem termed conflict reasoning, which involves identifying conflict-inducing conditions given only marginal datasets from each individual xApp. We propose ZODIAC, a three-stage framework for zero-shot conflict condition inference that comprises uncertainty-aware surrogate model training, trajectory-level diffusion training, and compositional guided denoising for efficient, physics-constrained, and reliable condition search. We derive a theoretical lower confidence bound showing that the compositional reasoning in ZODIAC serves as a principled surrogate for true conflict severity, with the epistemic penalty directly controlling the approximation gap. We evaluate ZODIAC on both the lightweight Mobile-Env platform across all three O-RAN Alliance conflict types (direct, indirect, and implicit) and a realistic NS-O-RAN-Flexric simulator. ZODIAC consistently outperforms baseline condition search methods, achieving over 20% higher True Positive Rate at Top-20, substantially stronger Spearman rank correlation, greater scenario diversity, and competitive computational efficiency. Ablation studies confirm the necessity of each guidance component, with epistemic uncertainty penalties proving essential for filtering spurious conflicts. To the best of our knowledge, ZODIAC is the first framework in O-RAN that enables conflict reasoning from marginal offline data without requiring any joint-execution traces.

翻译：暂无翻译