This paper proposes a three-year average of social attention as a more reliable measure of social impact for journals, since the social attention of research can vary widely among scientific articles, even within the same journal. The proposed measure is used to evaluate a journal's contribution to social attention in comparison to other bibliometric indicators. The study uses Dimensions as a data source and examines research articles from 76 disciplinary library and information science journals through multiple linear regression analysis. The study identifies socially influential journals whose contribution to social attention is twice that of scholarly impact as measured by citations. In addition, the study finds that the number of authors and open access have a moderate impact on social attention, while the journal impact factor has a negative impact and funding has a small impact.

翻译：本文提出将社会化关注度的三年平均值作为衡量期刊社会影响力的更可靠指标，因为即使在同一期刊内，研究的社会关注度在不同科学文章间也可能存在显著差异。该指标用于评估期刊对社会关注度的贡献，并将其与其他文献计量指标进行比较。本研究以Dimensions为数据源，通过多元线性回归分析对76种学科图书馆与信息科学期刊的研究文章进行考察。研究发现，具有社会影响力的期刊对社会关注度的贡献是引文所衡量学术影响力的两倍。此外，分析表明作者数量和开放获取对社会关注度有中等程度的影响，而期刊影响因子呈现负面影响，经费资助的影响则较小。