Medical vision-language models (VLMs) are evaluated on public benchmarks whose images and question-answer pairs have been freely available for years, yet reported accuracy assumes that these examples were not in the training data. We test this assumption for open VLMs on SLAKE-En, PathVQA, and VQA-RAD, and on a public mirror of OmniMedVQA, using four detectors: image near-neighbour search against PMC-OA-beta, canonical-order exchangeability, cohort-relative Min-K%++ tail enrichment, and cross-model top-K overlap. On the image side, 19.8% of SLAKE-En images have an unusually close neighbour in PMC-OA-beta under SigLIP-B-16 (4.2% under SigLIP-SO400M), while out-of-domain control images produce no flags. Manual inspection shows that these are images of the same modality and view from different patients, not exact copies, so we read the signal as overlap in image sources rather than memorization of individual images. On the text side, Qwen2.5-VL shows an exchangeability signal on SLAKE-En that survives an ordering ablation and two non-medical baseline models, and on the OmniMedVQA mirror exchangeability fires for five medical and general VLMs while BLIP-2 does not. The other two detectors fail a simple control: BLIP-2, which has no plausible exposure to medical VQA data, reproduces their apparent positive signals. Cohort-relative Min-K%++ and top-K overlap are therefore unreliable as standalone contamination signals for small groups of medical VLMs and should be checked against an outside baseline model.

翻译：暂无翻译