Empirical studies of electricity prices routinely state that their models use only information available at the time of the trading decision. For weather-driven forecasts drawn from commercial archives, this condition is harder to meet than it appears, and whether it holds can change over time. We identify three timing pitfalls. A forecast run is labelled by the issue time of its weather model, but becomes available hours later and keeps changing after publication. Auction gates follow local clock time, while archives use UTC. Outturn series are revised after publication without earlier values being kept. Using the timestamps of 128,656 forecast runs from ten weather-model configurations, matched to the day-ahead and first intraday auction gates in Great Britain over 2022-2026, we find that selecting "the latest run issued before the gate" picks a run not yet published at the gate on more than 99% of delivery days for six of the ten configurations at one of the two gates. For GFS at the day-ahead gate, the share is 0.6% in winter and 99.8% in summer. The exposure also shifts as publication delays drift, and an action margin of a few minutes can cost a full six-hour forecast cycle. The wrongly selected inputs differ materially from those available at the gate, but their apparent accuracy gain ranges from -9% to +24% across variables, models, gates and seasons, so its effect cannot be assumed and must be measured. We argue that point-in-time correctness is a dynamic property of the data pipeline, and propose a protocol that audits it from timestamps before any model is fitted.

翻译：暂无翻译