The Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) literature has produced a rapidly expanding catalogue of methods. We divide a PINN training pipeline systematically into four components and observe that many existing benchmarks study these components in isolation. These components are domain-importance adaptation, loss balancing, neural network architecture, and optimization scheme. Moreover, the studies set the surrounding and not considered components of the pipeline to a minimal default that is no longer representative of current best practice approaches. Conclusions drawn under such conditions may not transfer to competitive pipelines. In this work, we propose a new evaluation protocol that (1) treats the four components as an integrated system; (2) crucially requires competitive implementations of the components not under investigation; (3) specifies the metrics and reporting format; and (4) is accompanied by structured documentation that ensures the traceability of evaluations across studies. Based on this comprehensive protocol, we release PINNpipe, an innovative JAX package containing 18 different methods from the current literature as well as nine efficiently implemented benchmark problems. Using PINNpipe, we illustrate our evaluation protocol in relation to established benchmark studies and report results that challenge common assumptions.

翻译：暂无翻译