A droplet breaks up in tens of microseconds, and a recording captures perhaps a dozen frames. The states in between cannot be recovered without repeating the experiment, and simulating them is too costly to sweep an operating envelope. Yet they are present in the corpus as a whole: a campaign spanning a device's actuation range produces morphologies resembling those any single recording missed. Exploiting that requires a representation that is low-dimensional, invertible, and faithful to shape rather than to sampling. Proper orthogonal decomposition supplies the first two but measures distance in sampled coordinates; manifold learning supplies the third but no map back to a shape; elastic shape analysis supplies a shape metric but no reduced coordinates. SHROM composes all three. Interfaces are represented by their square-root velocity functions, a neighbour graph is built over that shape space, and an autoencoder is trained to reconstruct while penalising latents in which graph neighbours are not latent neighbours. The demonstration uses 301,539 inkjet droplet contours and four filmed break-up sequences. The graph term does not improve reconstruction. It determines whether position in the latent carries meaning: clustering the latent of an otherwise identical model recovers the shape-space partition at chance level (ARI = 0.063 +/- 0.059), and at 0.781 +/- 0.049 with the term active. Waveform parameters predict the full contour at R^2 = 0.878 +/- 0.026. Negative results are reported in the same terms. The graph metric proved immaterial across five choices, and interpolation error saturates at the reconstruction limit, so a plain autoencoder leads that task. The main limitation is interpolation across a topology change: no component of the regularised latent holds both a single-component and a post-break-up shape, whereas an unregularised autoencoder mixes them freely.

翻译：暂无翻译