Background and Objectives: Spatial mapping retains the spatial distribution of radiomic features, but computational cost and fragmented software limit its use. We developed Flash-Radiomics with scalar extraction and spatial mapping, a central processing unit (CPU) backend, a hybrid Compute Unified Device Architecture (CUDA) backend, consistent feature names, and Hierarchical Data Format version 5 (HDF5) storage. Methods: We evaluated Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI) compliance, CPU-CUDA concordance, and end-to-end processing time. Compliance testing included 825 chapter 1 (IBSI-1) tests covering 165 high-consensus features and 323 chapter 2 (IBSI-2) tests with numerical references. Concordance testing included 1,148 scalar pairs and 93 spatial-map pairs. End-to-end processing time was measured five times per input volume of interest (VOI) size. Comparisons included the Medical Image Radiomics Processor (MIRP) and PyRadiomics for 102 shared scalar features and PyRadiomics for 93 shared spatial maps. Results: Both backends passed all 1,148 IBSI tests, and all paired results were concordant. At the largest scalar input, CPU required 76.343 s and hybrid CUDA 81.915 s; CPU was 4.7 times faster than MIRP and 190.7 times faster than PyRadiomics. At the largest spatial input completed by both backends, hybrid CUDA reduced processing time by 68.6% relative to CPU (79.280 versus 252.791 s). At PyRadiomics' largest completed spatial input, hybrid CUDA was 84.9 times faster. Conclusions: Flash-Radiomics unified standardized scalar extraction, spatial mapping, concordant CPU-CUDA results, and HDF5 storage. CPU processing time was similar or shorter for scalar extraction, whereas hybrid CUDA was faster for spatial mapping under the tested conditions.

翻译：暂无翻译