Pervasive technologies combined with powerful AI have been recently introduced to enhance work productivity. Yet, some of these technologies are judged to be invasive. To identify which ones, we should understand how employees tend to judge these technologies. We considered 16 technologies that track productivity, and conducted a study in which 131 crowd-workers judged these scenarios. We found that a technology was judged harshly depending on the following three aspects of increasing importance. That is, whether the technology: 1) was currently supported by existing tools; 2) did not interfere with work or was fit for purpose; and 3) did not cause any harm or did not infringe on any individual rights. Ubicomp research currently focuses on how to design better technologies by making them more accurate, or by increasingly blending them into the background. It might be time to design better ubiquitous technologies by unpacking AI ethics as well.

翻译：最近引进了与强大的人工智能相结合的渗透性技术以提高劳动生产率。然而,其中一些技术被认为具有侵入性。为了确定哪些技术,我们应该了解雇员如何判断这些技术。我们考虑了跟踪生产率的16种技术,并进行了一项研究,131名人群工人在其中判断了这些情况。我们发现,对一种技术的判断严格取决于以下三个日益重要的方面。这就是,技术:(1)目前是否得到现有工具的支持;(2)没有干扰工作或符合目的;(3)没有造成任何伤害或侵犯任何个人权利。 Ubicombus研究目前侧重于如何设计更好的技术,使其更加准确,或者日益将其融入到背景之中。也许是时候通过解开AI的道德规范来设计更好的无所不在的技术了。