Currently, there is no common methodology or set of practices for evaluating memory-system performance in integrated simulation infrastructures. As a result, studies adopt different evaluation approaches, which can lead to conflicting conclusions even for the same simulation infrastructure. We propose a validation methodology that evaluates memory-system performance from three complementary views: the memory simulator, the CPU--memory interface and the simulated application. We use these views to detect, understand and correct memory-simulation inaccuracies arising from simulator integration and simplified modeling of microarchitectural features. The methodology reveals that the application's perception of memory performance can become effectively decoupled from the detailed memory simulation. Most importantly, we identify and correct a fundamental memory-model mismatch between delayed-response cycle-accurate memory simulators and ZSim, a representative parallel CPU simulator. We demonstrate the broader applicability of these enhancements by applying them to ZSim integrations with Ramulator 2, DRAMsim3 and DRAMSys 4, covering all major public cycle-accurate memory simulators. After the corrections and enhancements, all integrations reproduce the main bandwidth--latency trends and key characteristics of the actual system. Across the evaluated simulators, STREAM bandwidth differs from actual-hardware measurements by less than 5% in most experiments, while pointer-chase latency remains 15--18% lower than on actual hardware. All simulator enhancements are released as open source.

翻译：暂无翻译