Computing's dominant concepts - innovation, efficiency, resilience, professionalism - often migrate from reflective ideals to instruments that limit behaviour, redirect responsibility, and foreclose critique. We call this drift weaponisation: the discursive repurposing of professional concepts so that they stabilise business-as-usual while making structural alternatives appear unreasonable, illegible, or out of scope. Using collective autoethnography across education, justice, public administration, research management, and computing, we identify recurring mechanisms (simplification, individualisation, binary framing, metric substitution, hero/resilience scripts, organised ignorance). From this synthesis we propose Reframing - peaceful, practice-ready shifts (e.g., From Simplified Slogans to Structural Literacy; From Performative Compliance to Meaningful Outcomes; From Coping to Justice) - each paired with a 'do-now' prompt. The levers restore complexity, surface assumptions, and redirect attention to structural conditions without requiring formal authority. We contribute: (1) a cross-field account of weaponisation as a patterned phenomenon; (2) a portable reframing toolkit grounded in narrative and systems thinking; and (3) implications for computing within limits, including day-to-day practice shifts toward care, sufficiency, and justice.

翻译：计算机领域的主导概念——创新、效率、韧性、专业性——往往从反思性理想转向为限制行为、转移责任、并扼杀批判的工具。我们将这种漂移称为“武器化”：对专业概念进行话语转用，使其固化“一切照旧”，同时让结构性替代方案显得不合理、不可理解或超出范围。通过跨教育、司法、公共管理、研究管理与计算领域的集体自民族志研究，我们识别出反复出现的机制（简化、个体化、二元框架、指标替代、英雄/韧性叙事、组织化无知）。基于这一综合，我们提出“重新框架”——和平、实践即用的转变（例如：从简化口号到结构素养；从表演性合规到有意义成果；从应对到正义），每项均配有“立即行动”的提示。这些杠杆可恢复复杂性、揭示假设、并将注意力转向结构性条件，无需依赖正式权威。我们贡献：（1）跨领域武器化现象的模式化描述；（2）基于叙事与系统思维的便携式重新框架工具包；（3）对“有限计算”的启示，包括向关怀、充分性与正义的日常实践转变。