Adversarial consensus simulators require not only a model of message delivery but also a model of time. For timeout-sensitive protocols, coupling protocol-time progression to scheduler activity can allow communication scheduling to influence when failure detectors expire. We study this interaction in VeriProtocol using controlled Multi-Paxos and Raft experiments. In the primary Multi-Paxos study, we compare EventCoupled timing, where every scheduler opportunity advances protocol time, with RoundTick timing, which decouples individual scheduler events from timeout progression. At N=5, increasing the bounded message-delay budget from K=6 to K=14 increased the observed EventCoupled leadership-instability rate from 5\% to 100\% across the tested grid, while no additional valid leader elections occurred in any of the corresponding 140 RoundTick executions. At K=0, neither model produced additional elections. Matched-trace analysis identifies the mechanism: under EventCoupled timing, scheduler activity used to perturb communication also directly advances failure-detector state. Under RoundTick, comparable scheduler activity does not imply equivalent protocol-time progression. A targeted heartbeat-delay control confirms that RoundTick does not suppress timeout-driven elections; an additional election remains reachable when leader contact is unavailable across sufficient logical time.

翻译：暂无翻译