We investigate the relationship between base-extension semantics, Beth semantics, and Prawitz's ecumenical logic. We first present a base-extension semantics for the propositional fragment of Prawitz's system and prove that it is sound and complete. The semantics interprets intuitionistic and classical operators directly within a common proof-theoretic framework, without reducing the classical operators to their intuitionistic counterparts by means of a translation. We then analyse the effect of incorporating Beth-style clauses into base-extension semantics. When arbitrary bases are admitted and $\bot$ is governed by atomic explosion, these clauses trivialise. By contrast, when $\bot$ is treated as a basic sentence and attention is restricted to consistent bases, the Beth-style clauses for atoms and disjunction characterise, respectively, classical atoms and classical disjunction in Prawitz's system. We also obtain equivalent, path-independent formulations of the classical clauses for atoms, disjunction, and implication. These results reveal that the consistency constraint is not merely a technical restriction: within base-extension semantics, it transforms clauses originally associated with intuitionistic semantics into semantic characterisations of classical operators.

翻译：暂无翻译