A sound runtime admission gate executes only actions it can certify, and certifies only what its observations support. This paper asks how observations should be designed to maximize the set of actions that can be safely admitted, and shows the question is not a re-vocabulary of classical design problems. First, a projection--estimability separation: decomposing a constraint normal as $c=c_{\mathrm{Range}}+c_{\ker}$ relative to an information matrix, two-point discrimination along $c$ becomes arbitrarily reliable as the budget grows whenever $c_{\mathrm{Range}}\neq 0$, while robust admission of an action with normal $c$ is impossible at every budget whenever $c_{\ker}\neq 0$; such mixed directions are generic at any deficient rank, and at full rank the decoupling is bounded by the Kantorovich ratio and diverges with the condition number. Discrimination-optimal designs, being corner solutions of a linear criterion, land in exactly this regime. Second, an active-face equivalence theorem: the permissiveness-optimal design is $L$-optimal for a target matrix generated endogenously by the action faces that become certification bottlenecks, weighted inversely by their remaining slack; single-face collapse recovers $c$-optimal and goal-oriented design exactly, and a Caratheodory argument yields a bottleneck certificate of at most $r(r+1)/2+1$ faces. Around these we assemble exact certifiability per convex contract mode, for which $κ\approx 3.29$ is derived rather than calibrated, the $\sqrt{r}$ price of contract-agnostic design, an information-to-slack transfer theorem with a curvature-budget corollary, and a two-part audit in which a design meeting every margin requirement still leaves an action face at a certification cost above ten times its testing cost, in every probe library tested.

翻译：暂无翻译