This essay examines how judicial review should adapt to address challenges posed by artificial intelligence decision-making, particularly regarding minority rights and interests. As I argue in this essay, the rise of three trends-privatization, prediction, and automation in AI-have combined to pose similar risks to minorities. Here, I outline what a theory of judicial review would look like in an era of artificial intelligence, analyzing both the limitations and the possibilities of judicial review of AI. I draw on cases in which AI decision-making has been challenged in courts, to show how concepts of due process and equal protection can be recuperated in a modern AI era, and even integrated into AI, to provide for better oversight and accountability, offering a framework for judicial review in the AI era that protects minorities from algorithmic discrimination.

翻译：本文探讨司法审查应如何调整以应对人工智能决策带来的挑战，特别是涉及少数群体权利与利益的问题。本文认为，人工智能领域兴起的三大趋势——私有化、预测性与自动化——共同对少数群体构成了相似的风险。在此，笔者勾勒出人工智能时代司法审查理论的框架，分析对人工智能进行司法审查的局限性与可能性。通过援引人工智能决策在法庭上受到质疑的案例，本文展示了正当程序与平等保护原则如何在现代人工智能时代得以重构，甚至融入人工智能系统，以实现更有效的监督与问责，最终提出一个保护少数群体免受算法歧视的人工智能时代司法审查框架。