Synthetic text generation with Differential Privacy (DP) guarantees emerges as a principled approach that can enable the sharing of sensitive datasets across institutional and regulatory boundaries, while bounding the risks of re-identification and membership inference. LLM-based methods deliver promising results; however, comparisons are exacerbated by differing evaluation setups and "private" datasets, potential pre-training contamination is not considered and guarantees are not verified with DP audits. To advance this field, we introduce a unified evaluation framework with standardised utility and fidelity metrics and privacy audits, encompassing nine curated datasets that capture domain-specific complexities such as technical jargon, long-context dependencies, and specialised document structures. In a large-scale empirical study, we benchmark LLM-based state-of-the-art DP text generators of varying sizes (between 1--8B). Our results indicate that DP synthetic text generation remains an unsolved challenge, with quality deteriorating more as the private datasets deviate further from the generators' pre-training corpora. Our analyses suggest that synthetic data quality may be overestimated when LLMs have been pre-trained---without DP---on portions of the "private" data to be generated, and our membership inference (MIA) auditing setup for synthetic text reveals measurable membership signals even under tight privacy budgets. Finally, we note that under the "public pre-training, private generation" paradigm, the nominal $(\varepsilon,δ)$ guarantee does not account for exposure during pre-training, motivating contamination-aware evaluation of DP synthetic text generation. Code and data splits: https://github.com/ImperialGlobalSingapore/synbench

翻译：暂无翻译