Pre-submission hardening of human-authored LaTeX computer science papers differs from drafting assistance because it requires adversarial whole-paper review, explicit no-fix outcomes, and bounded artifact-safe revision. Existing writing assistants, critique generators, and judge-centered loops lack durable issue identity across rounds, deterministic routing from critique to adjudication, and manuscript control that can reject invalid concerns or defer author-dependent ones. We present PaperJury, a closed-loop review-verdict-revise-verify system built on a deterministic-versus-semantic split: deterministic orchestration manages decomposition, a frozen claim spine, a durable ledger, routing, stopping, and exact-once patch application, while semantic agents are limited to bounded review, judgment, and repair. PaperJury combines bounded holistic review, contestability-based routing, a due-process trial, and risk-proportional guard chains for anchor-bounded edits, yielding terminal outcomes of invalid-drop, valid-fixable, and author-required. In a two-arm expert-review evaluation on held-out Vision, natural language processing, and machine learning papers against four baselines, we assess issue quality, verdict and routing quality, edit safety, convergence behavior, and cost, supporting the thesis that load-bearing safety and completion logic should reside in deterministic orchestration rather than model discretion. PaperJury is available at https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury.
翻译:[translated abstract in Chinese]
针对人工撰写的LaTeX格式计算机科学论文,投稿前的强化处理区别于草稿辅助,其需要对抗性的全篇审阅、明确的不可修复结论以及有限制的工件安全修订。现有的写作辅助工具、评阅生成器及以评审者为中心的系统,缺乏跨轮次的持久问题标识、从评阅到裁决的确定性路由,以及能够拒绝无效质疑或推迟依赖作者问题的稿件控制能力。我们提出PaperJury——一个基于确定性-语义分离原则构建的闭环审阅-裁决-修订-验证系统:确定性编排负责分解任务、固定声明主干、持久化台账、路由控制、终止判定及精确一次的补丁应用,而语义智能体仅限于有限范围内的评阅、判断和修复。PaperJury结合了有限整体评阅、可争议性路由、程序正当性审判以及面向锚点约束编辑的风险比例守护链,最终输出无效-驳回、有效-可修复和依赖作者三类终结结果。在计算机视觉、自然语言处理和机器学习领域留出论文上,通过与四个基线系统进行双盲专家评审实验,我们从质疑质量、裁决与路由质量、编辑安全性、收敛行为及成本五个维度评估了系统性能,有力支撑了"承重安全与完成逻辑应置于确定性编排而非模型裁量"的核心论点。PaperJury代码已开源:https://github.com/u7079256/paperjury。