Accurate estimation of aboveground biomass density is essential for quantifying forest carbon stocks. NASA's GEDI mission provides valuable canopy structure data, but its sparse sampling necessitates the use of simulators to calibrate biomass models at field inventory locations. The widely used simulator of Hancock et al. (2019) emulates GEDI waveforms from airborne LiDAR point clouds, yet it has never been validated over European temperate forests. Here, we compare approximately 8,100 pairs of observed and simulated GEDI relative height (RH) profiles across French forests using the national airborne LiDAR program as input. We separate two sources of error: waveform modeling differences, assessed by referencing both simulated and real RH metrics to a common ALS-derived ground elevation, and ground detection bias, evaluated by comparing each GEDI L2A processing algorithm against the ALS reference. Under the baseline configuration, the mean absolute bias across the full RH profile reaches 0.67 m in leaf-on and 1.20 m in leaf-off conditions. Switching to intensity-based return weighting and selecting the a3 L2A algorithm reduces these biases to 0.43 m and 0.42 m respectively. The a3 algorithm also achieves near-unbiased ground detection (+0.04 m versus -0.82 m for the default), directly reducing a previously overlooked source of error. We also show that leaf-off acquisitions and low-sensitivity shots, both typically excluded from standard biomass products, are simulated as reliably as their counterparts, substantially expanding the potential calibration and inference datasets.

翻译：暂无翻译