The use of AI tools in research is becoming routine, alongside growing consensus that such use should be transparently disclosed. However, AI disclosure statements remain rare and inconsistent, with policies offering limited guidance and authors facing social, cognitive, and emotional barriers when reporting AI use. To explore how structured disclosure shapes what authors report and how they experience disclosure, we present DAISY (Disclosure of AI-uSe in Your Research), a form-based tool for generating AI disclosure statements. DAISY was developed from literature-derived requirements and co-design (N =11), and deployed in a user study with authors (N=31). DAISY-supported disclosures met more completeness criteria, offering clearer breakdowns of AI use across research and writing than unsupported disclosures. Surprisingly, despite concerns about how transparently disclosed AI use might be perceived, the use of DAISY did not reduce author comfort with the disclosure statements. We discuss design implications and a research agenda for AI disclosure as a sociotechnical practice.

翻译：研究中使用AI工具正逐渐成为常态，同时人们日益达成共识：此类使用应透明披露。然而，AI披露声明仍属罕见且缺乏一致性：相关政策提供的指导有限，作者在报告AI使用情况时面临社会、认知和情感障碍。为探究结构化披露如何影响作者的报告内容及其披露体验，我们提出DAISY（研究中AI使用的披露工具），一种用于生成AI披露声明的表单式工具。DAISY基于文献梳理的需求和协同设计（N=11）开发而成，并在作者用户研究（N=31）中部署。与无辅助披露相比，基于DAISY的披露满足了更完整的标准，能够更清晰地分解AI在研究与写作中的使用情况。令人惊讶的是，尽管人们担忧透明披露AI使用可能带来的影响，但使用DAISY并未降低作者对披露声明的舒适度。我们讨论了设计启示，并将AI披露视为一种社会技术实践，提出了相应的研究议程。