The statistical modeling of consensus in Delphi data faces a critical bottleneck: the high dimensionality of questionnaire items relative to the limited sample size of expert panels. This rank deficiency leads traditional latent variable models, such as Principal Component Analysis, to be structurally unstable and prone to overfitting. Addressing this methodological gap, this study proposes a transition from variable-centric covariance models to network-centric connectivity models. By mapping item correlations onto a weighted graph topology, we present a simulation-based benchmark that utilizes community detection algorithms to identify latent thematic structures, effectively addressing the spectral instability and rank deficiency typical of high-dimensional, low-sample-size regimes. The research systematically evaluates the robustness of topological approaches based on structural density, information flow, and spectral partitioning against synthetic datasets designed to replicate the pathological conditions of consensus data, including ordinal scales and systemic noise. The central methodological contribution lies in demonstrating that collinearity among expert judgments - traditionally treated as statistical redundancy to be regularized - can be effectively reinterpreted as a topological signal of cohesion. This framework provides researchers with a structured and automated procedure for dimensionality reduction, ensuring structural stability and psychometric consistency even in small-sample regimes where standard factor analysis breaks down.

翻译：暂无翻译