Diagnostic meta-analyses commonly assess small-study effects using the Deeks test, which tests for a study-size trend in the log diagnostic odds ratio. Under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model, this quantity reflects both latent accuracy and threshold unless the curve is symmetric. A threshold trend can therefore generate a log diagnostic odds ratio trend without a latent accuracy trend, or conceal an existing one. We develop a likelihood-ratio test of the latent accuracy trend under a common-shape binomial HSROC model. Its null hypothesis states that the summary curve is unchanged across study sizes. A log diagnostic odds ratio test using the same binomial fit provides a comparison with a different null hypothesis. In simulations, the proposed test remained near its nominal level under its null and had higher power than Deeks with a latent accuracy trend alone. In a colorectal cancer review of faecal immunochemical tests, it detected a negative latent accuracy trend obscured on the log diagnostic odds ratio scale by an opposing threshold contribution. All three tests detected size trends for impedance plethysmography in deep-vein thrombosis, where the fitted curve was nearly symmetric. The proposed test distinguishes changes in the summary curve from changes in operating position.

翻译：暂无翻译